© 2021 Birds in Latin
What’s Acceptable in Bird and Nature Photography Post-Processing?
Meta Description: Explore the ethics and art of post-processing in bird and nature photography. Learn how to enhance your images while staying true to your vision and captivating your audience.
Introduction: The Debate Around Post-Processing
How far is too far when it comes to post-processing in bird and nature photography? At what point does editing become misleading — and what is considered an absolute no-go?
This topic sparks endless debates among photographers. I often find myself in these discussions, which I enjoy because I tend to take a more liberal approach. You could say I’m the “elephant in the china shop” of the conservative, art-focused photography world.
In today’s age of social media and photography platforms, we’re all tempted to share our most striking images — as often as possible. Likes, comments, and shares have become a form of validation. But what truly makes a picture “better”?
Technical Perfection vs. Captivating Imagery
Scroll through any photography feed and you’ll find plenty of technically impressive images:
- Vibrant colors
- Perfect composition
- Sharp focus and ideal depth of field
- Interesting and well-positioned subjects
These images deserve recognition, and I always give a thumbs-up for effort. But then there are those rare shots that make you pause and look twice — the images that go beyond technical perfection and genuinely captivate.
In wildlife and nature photography, these images often inspire debate: how much editing is ethical, and where is the line between reality and artistry?
Post-Processing in Nature Photography: Reality vs. Emotion
Photography offers countless subjects and approaches, but in nature photography, I notice a trend: post-processing that extends beyond reality. Some edits are clumsy, but many images are simply breathtaking.
Often, I wonder… not a leaf out of place, no distracting branches or blemishes, and skies glowing with the perfect reds, oranges, or yellows. Social media is full of these “lucky” moments — yet, in my 61 years, I’ve rarely seen anything that matches.
The reality is that very few photographers share straight-out-of-camera (SOOC) images. Serious photographers tweak their RAW files, adjusting:
- Lights and shadows
- Levels and highlights
- Colors
- Cropping
Some go further, altering colors, removing elements, adding vignettes, or even fully reshaping a scene.
Question: Is there any difference between brushing something out of a picture and putting something into the picture?
Editing to Reflect Emotion, Not Just Reality
Editing to Reflect How You Felt
In my opinion, all of this is acceptable, as long as the final image enhances the viewer’s experience. A friend insists on showing exactly what he saw, but often, that’s impossible.
Imagine this scenario:
It’s 7 a.m., chilly, after a long hike to your perfect photography spot. Birds are singing, a roe deer runs in the distance, hares find shelter. You sip coffee, watch the sun turn cold blues into warm golds — a breathtaking, peaceful moment.
Can a single frame ever capture that experience? Probably not.
The next day, you start editing. Life’s distractions — noisy neighbors, slow computers, unpaid bills — make recalling the exact scene impossible. What you do remember is the feeling. So you edit based on that:
- Enhance the warm sunlight
- Bring out a reddish or golden sky
- Add birds for composition
- Remove distracting branches or clouds
What emerges is a work of art: not a literal snapshot, but a reflection of the emotion the scene inspired. The goal is to let viewers feel the same awe and joy you felt.
The Ethics of Post-Processing
Some photographers argue this is “too much” or “unethical.” Others embrace it as creative expression. In my view, both can coexist. Post-processing is a tool:
- Use it to improve visual storytelling
- Enhance colors, light, and composition
- Convey the emotional impact of the scene
When done thoughtfully, your image can be both beautiful and meaningful, while staying true to the spirit of bird and wildlife photography.
Conclusion
Post-processing is a balance between reality and emotion. Ethical editing doesn’t mean showing the exact moment as it appeared, but capturing the experience you want to share. Whether it’s a serene forest sunrise, a dramatic red sky, or the courtship of Great Crested Grebes, your edits should help the viewer feel what you felt.
At the end of the day, there’s no single right answer — only images that resonate, images that captivate, and images that bring joy. And that, to me, is the ultimate goal of photography.
Which picture from all the pictures above… is without serious alteration? Of course, all have been corrected to my satisfaction, but which one is without serious alteration? Let me know your thoughts.
